transfer amounted to a preference of the Bank over the other creditors, it should not be deemed fraudulent inasmuch as Mogi & Co., were ... Section 92 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1869 which deals with fraudulent preferences.
54. I will pause here to refer again to Lord Hobhouse
question of the decree-holders ' having been given or allowed fraudulent preference could have been raised by any other creditor. It is, therefore, contended ... creditors, could not, in my opinion have been considered a fraudulent preference and could not have been set aside at the instance of any other
question of the decree-holders having been given or allowed fraudulent preference could have been raised by any other creditor. It is, therefore, contended that ... creditors, could not in my opinion have been considered a fraudulent preference and could not have been set aside at the instance of any other
Calcutta High Court for release on bail, wire full details of charges preferred and when extradition proceedings expected. Police Commissioner, Calcutta.
14. To this ... Subbodh Chandra Ray Choudhuri was Assistant Treasury Officer at Jodhpur when he fraudulently obtained from Railway Auditor two cheques
Calcutta High Court for release on bail: wire full details of charges preferred, and when extradition proceedings expected. Police Commissioner, Calcutta.
14. To this ... Subodh Chandra Roy Chowdhry was Assistant Treasury Officer at Jodhpur when he fraudulently obtained from Railway Auditor two cheques
misconduct of the arbitrator, (b) either party having been guilty of fraudulent concealment of any matter which he ought to have disclosed or of wilfully ... found in his judgment that any party has been guilty of fraudulent concealment of any matter which he ought to have disclosed or of wilfully
misconduct of the arbitrator, (b) either party having been guilty of fraudulent concealment of any matter which he ought to have disclosed or of wilfully ... found in his judgment that any party has been guilty of fraudulent concealment of any matter which he ought to have disclosed or of wilfully
Martindale vs Emperor on 6 August, 1924
Equivalent citations: (1925)ILR 52CAL347
JUDGMENT
Walmsley, J
T.C.S. Martindale vs Emperor on 6 August, 1924
Equivalent citations: AIR1925CAL14, 84IND. CAS
(Sir) Hukumchand Kasliwal And Anr. vs Radhakissen Chamaria And Ors. on 11 November, 1924
Equivalent
