Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.04 seconds)

State Of Karnataka vs K T Rajashekar on 18 March, 2020

enactment and such 28 validation does not constitute an encroachment on the function of the judiciary. [See: 'MISRI LAL JAIN VS. STATE OF ORISSA ... sovereign functionaries. In order that rule of law permeates to fulfil constitutional objectives of establishing an egalitarian social order, the respective sovereign functionaries need free
Karnataka High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Shree. Samsthana vs U.F.M. Ananthraj on 24 August, 2020

Naganand, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent-plaintiffs submitted that the functions of Upadhivantas and Archakas are different. The notification dated 12.08.2008 passed ... insofar as the said Act is not applicable to the hereditary functionaries and Mutts and in view of the same, the Government Order dated
Karnataka High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next