Sanjay Kumar Agarwal vs Union Of India on 14 February, 2025
Author: Sujit Narayan Prasad
Dhananjay P. Raipat vs Ranchi Municipal Corporation & Ors on 12 December, 2025
Author: Sujit
Dhananjay P. Raipat vs Ranchi Municipal Corporation & Ors on 12 December, 2025
Author: Sujit
order dated 15.09.2025. Therefore,
this Court has constrained to criticize the State functionary by making
statement at paragraph 11 of the order dated 13.10.2025 making ... that 'This Court fails
to understand that how the State is functioning in absence of any
specific Rule by denying the promotion
order dated 15.09.2025. Therefore,
this Court has constrained to criticize the State functionary by making
statement at paragraph 11 of the order dated 13.10.2025 making ... that 'This Court fails
to understand that how the State is functioning in absence of any
specific Rule by denying the promotion
order dated 15.09.2025. Therefore,
this Court has constrained to criticize the State functionary by making
statement at paragraph 11 of the order dated 13.10.2025 making ... that 'This Court fails
to understand that how the State is functioning in absence of any
specific Rule by denying the promotion
order
dated 15.09.2025. Therefore, this Court has constrained to
criticize the State functionary by making statement at
paragraph 11 of the order dated 13.10.2025 making ... effect that „This Court fails
to understand that how the State is functioning in absence of
any specific Rule by denying the promotion
order
dated 15.09.2025. Therefore, this Court has constrained to
criticize the State functionary by making statement at
paragraph 11 of the order dated 13.10.2025 making ... effect that „This Court fails
to understand that how the State is functioning in absence of
any specific Rule by denying the promotion
order
dated 15.09.2025. Therefore, this Court has constrained to
criticize the State functionary by making statement at
paragraph 11 of the order dated 13.10.2025 making ... effect that „This Court fails
to understand that how the State is functioning in absence of
any specific Rule by denying the promotion
order
dated 15.09.2025. Therefore, this Court has constrained to
criticize the State functionary by making statement at
paragraph 11 of the order dated 13.10.2025 making ... effect that „This Court fails
to understand that how the State is functioning in absence of
any specific Rule by denying the promotion