arrived at the following conclusion:-
“As mentioned above, an Upa-Lokayukta does function as an adjudicating
authority but the Act places him short ... than an investigator or an inquisitorial authority largely
exercising administrative or executive functions and powers. Under the
circumstances, taking an overall view of the provisions
senior counsel would
submit that it would depend upon the work and function
of the disabled person whether he can carry out the
nature ... appellant in this appeal with regard to their disability and
also their functional disability regard being had to the
12
nature of the work
senior counsel would submit
that it would depend upon the work and function of the disabled
person whether he can carry out the nature ... appellant in this
appeal with regard to their disability and also their functional
disability regard being had to the nature of the work. The report
concept was unnecessarily highlighted. She would
21
canvass that when the statutory function is not carried
out and the fundamental choice which is available ... violation of such right because of the
negligence of the State functionaries, the victim is
22
entitled to get compensation. To buttress the said
submission
Orissa Olympic Associkation ... vs State Of Orissa And Anr on 3 April, 2017
Equivalent citations
The State Of Gujarat vs I.R.C.G. on 29 August, 2017
Equivalent citations
Shri Venkateshwara University vs Union Of India on 1 September, 2017
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2017
Kalpana Mehta And Ors. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 5 April, 2017
Author
Orissa Olympic Associkation ... vs State Of Orissa on 3 April, 2017
Author: Dipak Misra
Bench
