Rules against the
appellant and as per G.O.Ms.No.368, dated 18.10.1993, the
persons against whom, specific charges under Rule 17 (b) were ... view of the
respondent inasmuch as even as per G.O.Ms.No.368, dated
18.10.1993, pendency of enquiry proceedings under Rule
year 2012-2013 afresh in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.368 P & AR dated
18.10.1993 and in the light ... G.O.Ms.No.169 dated 02.01.2011, (ii)
G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 23.12.2011 (iii)G.O.Ms.No.120 dated
effect from
2010 and the same was completed 31.03.20 and the crucial date for preparation
of the petitioner for the year ... hence, his name was not included
I as per G.O.Ms.No.368 dated 18.10.1993. Hence, I do not find any error
from the actual date of
increment namely 01.07.2013. If the appellant / Corporation had chosen to
implement the order from the date of service ... promotion in
view of G.O.Ms.No.368 dated 18.10.1993 should be deemed to be pending
and there was no other major punishment. Hence
effect from
2010 and the same was completed 31.03.20 and the crucial date for preparation
of the petitioner for the year ... hence, his name was not included
I as per G.O.Ms.No.368 dated 18.10.1993. Hence, I do not find any error
contended that the Government
issued G.O.Ms.No.368 Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Personnel-s)
Department dated 18.10.1993, wherein, it directed to fill ... guidelines issued by the Government vide
G.O.(Ms).No.368 Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department dated
18.10.1993. The said G.O. provides a detailed
instructions issued in G.O.Ms.No.368
P & AR (S) Department, dated 18.10.1993 and in the
Government Letter No.90586/94-2, dated ... terms
of the instructions issued in G.O.Ms.No.368 P & AR (S)
Department dated 18.10.1993 and in the Government letter
No.90586
Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955. As per
G.O.Ms.No.937, Home (Pol.III) Department, dated 21.07.1998, makes it
clear that the Head Constables ... qualify as per the
Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.368 P&AR Department, dated
18.10.1993. In the present case, PR was pending
reduction of pay by two stages for two years without cumulative effect dated
05.06.2000, his name was not recommended for inclusion in the panel ... guidelines issued in G.O.Ms.No.368, Personnel
and Administrative Reforms Department dated 18.10.1993 and his name was
included in the panel for promotion
which cannot be included as qualifying service as
per G.O.Ms.No.15 dated 07.01.2010. Further at that time, he was dealt with ... G.O.(Ms.) No.15 dated 07.01.2010 and
guidelines issued for promotion/upgradation vide G.O.Ms.No.368, dated
