Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 8214 (0.02 seconds)

Shrikant Tiwari vs M/O Railways on 14 February, 2018

court of first instance that he/she was not gainfully employed or was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants to avoid payment ... also lead cogent evidence to prove that the employee/workman was gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he/she was drawing
Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Narender Singh vs Govt. Of Nctd on 5 October, 2015

plead and prove that during the intervening period the employee was gainfully employed and was getting the same emoluments. Denial of back wages ... Court of first instance that he/she was not gainfully employed or was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants to avoid payment
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepak Nath vs Defence on 20 February, 2026

Defence Estates Office, Bhubaneswar Circle; the two other sons are gainfully employed; the widow of the deceased employee is getting monthly family pension; they have ... Niraj Kumar Singh (2007) 2 SCC 481]. r) Dependents if gainfully employed cannot be considered [see Haryana Public Service Commission v. Harinder Singh
Central Administrative Tribunal - Lucknow Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

T Munikrishnaiah vs M/O Railways on 12 February, 2024

premises that the burden to show that the workman was gainfully employed during interregnum period was on the employer. This Court, in a number ... raise any plea in his written statement that he was not gainfully employed during the said period. It is now well settled by various decisions
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next