judgment was passed and the same was communicated to the appellant-company (Garnishee) on 17th Sept. 1960. After passing of the decree in the money ... initiated and the Controller of Accounts of the Garnishee Company was called upon to deposit the attached amounts in court.
5.
The Garnishee company raised
most closely to the attachment of a debt in this country, a garnishee order nisi. It appears to me that the two proceedings differ ... Order 45 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, a garnishee may, upon the application of a person who has obtained a judgment against
Prasanthi Cashew
Company, Kollam seeking a declaration that Ext.P8 garnishee
order dated 28-5-2003 issued by the E.S.I. Corporation ... appellant E.S.I.
Corporation issued Ext.P8 garnishee order dated 28-5-2003
against the Manager, Vysiya Bank, Chinnakkada, Kollam for the
said
JUDGMENT
Govindan Nair, J.
1. This revision petition by a garnishee raises two questions. One relates to the maintainability of the revision itself ... other about the correctness of the order directing the garnishee to produce the attached amount in court forthwith.
2. The first counter-petitioner had obtained
third defendant Nachimuthu (Mari's son). Garnishee proceedings, under Order XXI, Rule 46, Civil P. C. were taken and as nothing materialized, the plaintiff ... judgment-debtor is prevented from collecting the amounts due from the garnishee and any payment made by the debtor (garnishee) to the judgment-debtor would
persons Ram Chandra and Ramesh Chandra who are described as garnishees and the respondents are Ram Lal and Nathu Lal who are described as decree ... proceedings that ought to have been taken by the decree-holders were garnishee proceedings as contemplated by Order 21, Rule 131 and subsequent Rules
file of the Sub Court, Madurai who is only a garnishee. The first respondent filed the said suit for recovery ... second respondent herein, lying in the hands of the petitioner. In the garnishee application, notice was Order ed to the petitioner. Since the petitioner
administration suit. This was sent, but on 23rd February a garnishee notice was served on the defendant company on behalf of the bank ... defendant company entered appearance in suit No. 1666 of 1939 and the garnishee proceedings were disposed of by agreed minutes to the following effect
behalf of the
Appellants that rent has not been paid by the Garnishee since August, 2018.
Relevant extract of the said order dated 5th July ... instructions as to the
details and the amounts being paid by the
garnishee, as rent for the premises X-36 Okhla,
Industrial Area, Phase
dated the 2nd August, 1921 the insolvent purported to give to the garnishee his motor car as security for an advance ... entitled to the car free from any charge in favour of the garnishee as, being at the commencement of the insolvency with the consent
