Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913
Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913
BENGAL PRESIDENCY
India
Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 5485 (0.35 seconds)Food Corporation Of India vs Sukh Prasad on 24 March, 2009
sought against FCI also, the position is that FCI was only a
`garnishee defendant' and not a `principal defendant'. The order dated ... injunction order, but an interim prohibitory
(garnishee) order by way of attachment before judgment, in regard to
the rents payable for one godown taken
Section 128 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
valuation of such suits for the purposes of jurisdiction; (d) procedure in garnishee and charging orders either in addition to, or in substitution
Begg, Dunlop And Co. vs Jagannath Marwari on 28 June, 1911
decree to the Court, within the local limits of which the garnishee, that is, the debtor of the judgment-debtor, resides. Two objections, however, have ... Rules of the Supreme Court, Ireland, 1905, provides that, before a garnishee order can be obtained, it must be shown that the debtor
Common Law Procedure Act 1854
Debts owing or accruing from such Third Person (herein-after called the Garnishee) to the Judgment Debtor shall be attached to answer the Judgment Debt ... same or any subsequent Order it may be ordered that the Garnishee shall appear before the Judge or a Master of the Court, as such
Surinder Nath Kapoor vs Union Of India & Ors on 3 August, 1988
SCALE (2)318
ACT:
Income Tax Act, 1961 -Whether a garnishee order passed by
Income-tax Officer under section 226(3) (x) -Of-For payment ... Krishna Kapoor &
Co. The IAC (Asstt.) passed a garnishee order under section
226 (3) (x) of the Income
Beharilal Ramcharan vs Income-Tax Officer, Special Circle 'B' ... on 21 July, 1981
statement made on oath is false in any material particulars
the garnishee is made personally liable to the Income Tax
Officer to the extent ... opinion the statement on oath made on behalf of the
garnishee is false in any material particulars the Income
Tax Officer would have to give
The Official Assignee vs E. Narasimha Mudaliar, Proprietor Of ... on 12 March, 1929
Court for some reason, I never quite understood, as "garnishees"--should be examined, which of course in effect means cross-examined ... Court then and there to pass a decree against the garnishees on the ground that though they are not tantamount to direct admissions they were
Madan Lal Lohia vs Assistant Controller & Ors on 11 April, 1977
Garnishee Proceedings--Estate Duty Act, 1953 (Act 34 of
1953), S. 73(5) r/w. s. 46(5 A) of the Income ... must be in
default within the meaning of s. 45 . Where a garnishee is
required by notice issued under sub-section (5A) of section
Om Sakthi Renergies Limited vs Megatech Control Limited on 7 February, 2006
short the Act) making absolute the prohibitory order restraining
the Garnishee, the second respondent in this appeal, from making any payment
to the appellant ... praying for a prohibitory order restraining
the second respondent/Garnishee from paying to the appellant the amounts, and
consequently restraining the appellant from receiving monies