sought against FCI also, the position is that FCI was only a
`garnishee defendant' and not a `principal defendant'. The order dated ... injunction order, but an interim prohibitory
(garnishee) order by way of attachment before judgment, in regard to
the rents payable for one godown taken
decree to the Court, within the local limits of which the garnishee, that is, the debtor of the judgment-debtor, resides. Two objections, however, have ... Rules of the Supreme Court, Ireland, 1905, provides that, before a garnishee order can be obtained, it must be shown that the debtor
SCALE (2)318
ACT:
Income Tax Act, 1961 -Whether a garnishee order passed by
Income-tax Officer under section 226(3) (x) -Of-For payment ... Krishna Kapoor &
Co. The IAC (Asstt.) passed a garnishee order under section
226 (3) (x) of the Income
statement made on oath is false in any material particulars
the garnishee is made personally liable to the Income Tax
Officer to the extent ... opinion the statement on oath made on behalf of the
garnishee is false in any material particulars the Income
Tax Officer would have to give
Court for some reason, I never quite understood, as "garnishees"--should be examined, which of course in effect means cross-examined ... Court then and there to pass a decree against the garnishees on the ground that though they are not tantamount to direct admissions they were
Garnishee Proceedings--Estate Duty Act, 1953 (Act 34 of
1953), S. 73(5) r/w. s. 46(5 A) of the Income ... must be in
default within the meaning of s. 45 . Where a garnishee is
required by notice issued under sub-section (5A) of section
short the Act) making absolute the prohibitory order restraining
the Garnishee, the second respondent in this appeal, from making any payment
to the appellant ... praying for a prohibitory order restraining
the second respondent/Garnishee from paying to the appellant the amounts, and
consequently restraining the appellant from receiving monies
Sardar Singh. The decree-holder sought execution of the decree by taking garnishee proceedings in respect of the share of the hire money due from ... appellant company to Sardar Singh. The application for obtaining the garnishee order was presented on 1st of June, 1942, by the decree-holder
insolvent on and after the 19th May 1917 to the garnishees T.B. Mehta and Sons, was void as a fraudulent preference under Section ... meet his obligations as they fell due. He was indebted to the garnishees Messrs. Mehta and Sons, a Madras firm with whom
which security was given to the present appellant, Samu Patter, called the Garnishee, for Rs. 43,668-5-11 should be set aside ... report was read and the affidavits filed on behalf of the Garnishee were re ad presumably and then the deponents thereto were put into
