Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Gem Plus
Jewellery India Ltd. , 2010 SCC OnLine Bom
2068.
x. Kunhayammed Vs. State of Kerala
Bombay High Court, in the case of CIT vs. Gem Plus
Jewellery India Limited , reported in 2011 330 ITR 175, which reads as
follows
suggested for each industry. Coming to Synthetic Gems it is observed as follows :-
"Indo Swiss Synthetic Gem Manufacturing Company.
It cannot be said that ... Calcium carbide
15
4.5
4.
Synthetic Gem
15
4.0
5.
Aluminium
15
3.5
6.
Fertiliser
15
(i)
Supply
shall have the option to apply for
benefit either under the Target Plus Scheme or under the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ... Customs and
gems and jewellery shipping bills but excluding exports
specified under Para 3.7.5, shall be eligible for benefits
under the Target Plus Scheme
relates to the following institutions:-
"Cottage and Tiny Industries, Small Gem Cutting units where Cutting operation is done with or without power, Powerlooms, Sericulture ... service
per month of Rs.60
per service for 2
months
PLUS
2.Energy Charges-
a)For consumption upto 250
KWH per month/upto
National Mineral Development ... vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 20 January, 1987
Equivalent citations
Robert A. Heflin vs Mrs. Revathi Ramachandran (Also In Her ... on 5 August, 2002
Author
A.Purushothaman vs Pondicherry Industrial Promotion on 4 December, 2017
Bench: S.Manikumar , R.Pongiappan
Unknown vs M/S. Everest Industries Limited on 31 March, 2022
Author: R. Mahadevan
Bench
J.K. Pharmachem Limited vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 21 October, 2003
IN
