trade mark
Meronem against use of the trade mark Meromer. It is noticeable
that the proprietor of the earlier mark merely omitted the letters ... proprietor of the trade mark Meto
against use of the trade mark Metox. In this case, the earlier mark,
Meto, was formed merely by appropriating
generic name which still conveys to the buyer the original generic connotation of the abbreviated name, is still, "generic ".
If the abbreviation ... generic name which still conveys to the buyer the original generic connotation of the abbreviated name, is still, 'generic'.
42. Phonetically, the words
mark, must be considered by plotting the
trade mark of the defendant on the sliding scale of the strength of the marks,
namely from generic ... nature. The mark of the plaintiff is a "label mark" and the mark of
the defendants, is a "word mark
Mark Sullivan etc., et al) , wherein it is held as follows:
"Burden of proof is on party seeking to have registered mark declared generic ... learned counsel also relied on various foreign judgment relating to generic/descriptive mark like "sandwitch chef" and "burger chef". "Eveready
Trade Marks Registry raised objections
under Section 11 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (the Trade Marks Act . With
specific reference to the device mark ... nature of
its mark and represented that the mark was distinguishable for that reason.
The plaintiff also asserted that the composite mark had acquired
M/S. Itc Limited vs Nestle India Limited on 10 June, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
exclusionary rights cannot be afforded to the holder of
such a generic/descriptive mark, the plaintiff herein.
61. Contrary to the plaintiff’s submissions ... registered mark, and used the mark “SPRINKLERS” as
a descriptive adjective and further, the very words
SPRINKLE/SPRINKLERS is a generic and descriptive word
exclusionary rights cannot be afforded to the holder of
such a generic/descriptive mark, the plaintiff herein.
61. Contrary to the plaintiff’s submissions ... registered mark, and used the mark “SPRINKLERS” as
a descriptive adjective and further, the very words
SPRINKLE/SPRINKLERS is a generic and descriptive word
exclusionary rights cannot be afforded to the
holder of such a generic/descriptive mark, the plaintiff herein.
_______________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page ... registered mark, and used the mark “SPRINKLERS” as
a descriptive adjective and further, the very words
SPRINKLE/SPRINKLERS is a generic and descriptive word
keywords to
trigger an ad, as the mere use of a trade mark as a
trigger does not violate any rights of a trademarks ... party defendant to the present suit is fatal. The words are generic
and descriptive. For separating the words and using them accordingly, the
appellant does
