purpose of marketing
the products in the Temtorty under trademarks of
generic names, on the terms and conditions as
hereinafter provided
distinct object or
article or thing having a different name, character and use or
bringing into existence of a new and distinct object or article ... change and the final product is generically new and distinct. It
is also known by a distinct name and the usage itself is different
manufactures and Generic Brand owners. Indian pharmaceutical products
are known as generic branded formulations, which is sold under a brand
(Brand Name), the ownership
relating to the case.
Assessee is engaged in manufacturing and selling of generic injectable
drugs to its group entities and certain other concerns called ... subsidiary of Hospira Pte. Ltd, Singapore. Assessee had on
15.12.2009 acquired the generic injectable pharmaceutical business of
M/s. Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals
case are that the assessee is engaged in
manufacturing and selling of generic injectable drugs to its group
entities and certain other concerns called ... subsidiary of Hospira
Pte. Ltd, Singapore. Assessee had on 15.12.2009 acquired the
generic injectable pharmaceutical business of M/s. Orchid Chemicals
& Pharmaceuticals
records, the impugned provision was pertaining to
transactions of assessee's generic injectable finished dosage business
ITA No.73/Chny/2024
:- 12 -:
which stood ... party. Thus the new entity namely
Hospira Health Care India Private Limited which had taken over
assessee's generic injectable finished dosage business also
With regard to the last contention raised by the ld.AR, namely
that the JCIT could not have understood Tamil and therefore could
not have ... case of the assessee (an individual) has been drafted in a generic
manner, repeatedly referring to "assessee firm" and failing to
address
With regard to the last contention raised by the ld.AR, namely
that the JCIT could not have understood Tamil and therefore could
not have ... case of the assessee (an individual) has been drafted in a generic
manner, repeatedly referring to "assessee firm" and failing to
address
With regard to the last contention raised by the ld.AR, namely
that the JCIT could not have understood Tamil and therefore could
not have ... case of the assessee (an individual) has been drafted in a generic
manner, repeatedly referring to "assessee firm" and failing to
address
With regard to the last contention raised by the ld.AR, namely
that the JCIT could not have understood Tamil and therefore could
not have ... case of the assessee (an individual) has been drafted in a generic
manner, repeatedly referring to "assessee firm" and failing to
address
