bills without recommendation by Bursar. The
responsibility of the petitioner for violation of GFR about these purchases
was established.
Charge No.3.5.3
This ... made, however, only a limited
tender inquiry was made. There was violation of GFR to this extent. The
petitioner was held responsible for infraction
account books.
x. The FIR further states that the Petitioner violated GFR Rules,
which only permit single purchase not exceeding Rs. 25 Lakhs.
y. These ... Hospital at the time and was found to have violated the
mandatory provision of GFR which states that in a single purchase,
the amount cannot
GFR
establishes a crucial and beneficial procedure and it is immaterial
whether GFR can attain status as statutory instructions. It was argued
that the GFR ... expenditure,
but rather, that GFR are not binding to begin with and even if so, GFR
have not been violated.
82. As noted above
GFR
establishes a crucial and beneficial procedure and it is immaterial
whether GFR can attain status as statutory instructions. It was argued
that the GFR ... expenditure,
but rather, that GFR are not binding to begin with and even if so, GFR
have not been violated.
82. As noted above
Presenting Officer was asked about the specific rule
of GFR that has been violated by the charged officer. The
Presenting Officer submitted as under ... record. Since the charge sheet did not mention which
GFR Rule was violated, the Inquiry Officer has asked the Presenting
Officer as to which Rule
even
responded to. Serious instances of financial irregularities in violation of
the GFR provisions had already come to light and referred to in the last ... accounts, award of contracts (without
floating of tenders in violation of the provisions of GFR) and sanctions
issued at rates much higher than the existing
GFR and CPWD Manual. He would state
that apart from gross violation of GFR and CPWD Manual the facts indicate
that entire tendering process
also found the respondent No.4 QCI to be in
violation of the GFR. Though it was stated that the grant ... recovery
of the funds, which had been spent in violation of the GFR.
8. All the aforesaid leaves us with an impression that inspite
school and,
WHEREAS, Ms. Archana Tuli as Vice-Principal violated
the GFR and CCS Rules by bestowing undue benefits,
monetarily and others to Ms. Rashmi
payments
were clubbed with other bills. Not calling quotations was a violation
of prescribed procedure in the General Financial Rules. This charge
was established ... bills without recommendation by Bursar. The
responsibility of the petitioner for violation of GFR about these
purchases was established. The other charges proved also showed
