Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

GFR and CPWD Manual. He would state that apart from gross violation of GFR and CPWD Manual the facts indicate that entire tendering process

2020 price during the year 2009-10 as such violated the rule 154 of GFR. He also did not obtain/keep the specimen copy

Authority till he join office back. Thus, Shri. Vinod Kumar Kataria has violated the provisions of Rule 47 (1) & ( 2) of the CCRT Service ... cost 25,000/- on 18,12.2018 utilizing Rule 154 of GFR, 2017. The water meter was available in the market

only violative of Public Procurement (Preference to Make in India) Order, 2017 (PPP- MII Order 2017) issued by DIPP, but also in violation ... participation, is in violation Public Procurement (Preference to Make in India) Order 2017. Also, as per Rule 144(i)(b) of GFR Signature Not Verified

only violative of Public Procurement (Preference to Make in India) Order, 2017 (PPP-MII Order 2017) issued by DIPP, but also in violation ... participation, is in violation Public Procurement (Preference to Make in India) Order, 2017. Also, as per Rule 144(i)(b) of GFR 2017, procuring agency

Judicial fora, respondents are deliberately not regularizing the services of the applicant violating the rules/law. After rendering 24 years of service, representation was submitted ... work done by the casual labour invoking General Fundamental Rules (for short GFR), and pay them from Contingent office expenditure but not from wages head

pointed by the respondents, no one should be appointed in public institutions violating Article 14 of the Constitution. In the same vein, the respondents cannot ... policy decision to outsource work through tender process by duly amending GFR, the respondents appear to have not worked on this. Without doing

that they were engaged on contract basis by giving artificial breaks violating the legal principles laid down the Hon'ble Apex Court in Nihal ... followed. Articles 14 , 16 and 21 of the Constitution have been violated. Applicants submitted other judgments of the superior judicial fora in support of their

contract, cancellation issued by the respondent is valid and not violative of the provisions of the Constitution of India, there is no ARBT No. 5797 ... Arbitrator failed to appreciate that the instructions contained in Chapter 6 of GFR 2017 are general instructions on performance security, whereas, the Government of India

Montecarlo Limited & Anr. vs National High Speed Rail Corporation ... on 23 August, 2021 Bench