same contractor on nomination basis without competitive bidding, which
violates the GFR provisions/guidelines of the Govt."
5. The respondents further state that
renovation which
tantamount of misuse of Govt. Fund, thereby violating
the provisions Rule 21 of GFR, 2005.
By his above acts, Dr. P. Jayasankar ... expenditure of Rs.
61,500 was incurred in violation of Rule 21 of the GFR,
2005.
He refunded Rs. 26,260/- (Rupees Twenty six
thousand
renovation which tantamount of misuse of
Govt. Fund, thereby violating the provisions Rule 21 of GFR,
2005.
By his above acts, Dr. P. Jayshankar ... incurred in violation of Rule 21 of the GFR, 2005.
He refunded Rs. 26,260/- (Rupees twenty six thousand
two hundred sixty only
tender which is thereof, is arbitrary, anti-
competitive and violative of Rule 144 of the GFR, 2017.
19. He also submitted that, Rule ... Rule
159 of the GFR, 2017.
21. Another submission of Mr. Nayar is that, Rule 161 of the GFR, 2017,
which mandates that, in respect
further urges that such actions are in violation of the General
Financial Rules, 2017 ['GFR Rules'] and settled principles governing public
procurement, which ... have interfered with the Tender
process where the essential eligibility conditions are violated.
Submissions by Respondent No. 1
4. Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, learned counsel
concession.
4. He submits that the condition imposed by the authorities
is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. He
further points ... duty free business is required but the same is
in violation of the GFR, 2017 Rule 173(b) wherein it is
provided that the criteria
access of his Authority and in violation of
the General Financial Rules (GFR) would not bind the Government for creating
any financial liability. Further
Director for two bid system, was in total contradiction of
provisions of GFR 2005 and directions of Central Vigilance
Commission, and was in fact engineered ... Such act of Shri Rajiv
Lochan was in blatant violation of rules/guidelines/directions of GFR
2005 and Central Vigilance Commission.
Shri Rajiv Lochan
crores
to Rs. 19 crores in an unfair manner violates Rule IV of the GFR, 2017. As per the
Informants, Rule IV states that turnover ... conditions are not per se violative of
the provisions of the Act, the Commission has also perused the GFR, 2017 in view of the
allegation
mention the
proper instructions / provisions / rules in violation of the various
provisions of GFR and delegation of financial power during the
procurements under Minor Work ... supply of
manpower at RO, Rajkot by violating the provisions prescribed under
Rule 225 (xv) of GFR 2017 and CVC Circular dated 06.11.2008. The
said
