Gian Kaur Suri vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. [Along With ... on 8 July, 2005
Equivalent citations: AIR2005DELHI394, 122(2005)DLT1, AIR 2005 DELHI ... building activities on plots that had been regularized.
8. Petitioner in Gian Kaur Suri 's case seek to assail the findings of sanction
been occupying the suit property as a tenant under Smt. Gian Kaur Sud ever since 15.9.1987 and that he was paying rent ... been paying rent of the suit property to Smt. Gian Kaur Sud. That lease deed dated 29.9.1990 was never executed between the plaintiff
impermissible, which was so held
by the Constitution Bench in Gian Kaur [Gian Kaur v.
State of Punjab ... noted that in Gian Kaur case
[ Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab , (1996) 2 SCC 648
: 1996 SCC (Cri) 374] although the Supreme
Court
filed this appeal.
(2) The case for the prosecution is this. Gian Kaur (PW 1) with her family including the daughter Manjit Kaur resided ... about 9.30 p.m. and went upstairs.
(4) The case of Gian Kaur further is that at about 12.30 am. she heard the shrieks
appeal and indispensable facts
are to the effect that the deceased Gian Kaur was sleeping on the terrace of
her house. In the early morning ... help of her brother Maan Singh.
5. On 05.04.2000, Mrs. Gian Kaur was admitted to Safdarjung hospital
by her daughter and son, in 100% burnt
respect of Will dated 27th April, 1987, of late Mrs. Gian Kaur wife
of late Shri S. Rattan Singh Khanpuri.
3. In the petition ... 2018 Page 1 of 7
the testatrix, late Mrs. Gian Kaur wife, who expired on 02nd April,
2011 in New Delhi. The testatrix is stated
others v. Idol of Sri Swaminathaswami Swaminathaswami Thirukoil and others, ; and Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab ,
14. Article 21 in its expanded horizon confers
sufficient for the needs of the petitioners. The contention
that Gian Kaur has left a Will bequeathing this property in favour of the
petitioner
Supreme Court in the cases titled State of Punjab Vs. Gian Kaur
and Anr. reported as 1998 Crl. L.J 2061, State of Maharashtra
others v.
Idol of Sri Swaminathaswami Swaminathaswami Thirukoil
and others, ; and Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab ,
14. Article 21 in its expanded horizon confers
