Singh on 19.10.1971 for declaration to the effect that the gift deed No.1709
executed by Gian Singh, their brother, in favour of Pritam Kaur ... legal relation with Gian Singh
and that the gift deed had been executed and got registered in order to avoid
a pre-emption suit, whereas
that in order to
defeat his rights of pre-emption, it was camouflaged as a gift. He further
claimed the market value of the property ... pre-empt
the transaction by submitting that there was no sale and rather, it was a
gift by way of gift deed dated 24.12.1979. They
that in order to
defeat his rights of pre-emption, it was camouflaged as a gift. He further
claimed the market value of the property ... pre-empt
the transaction by submitting that there was no sale and rather, it was a
gift by way of gift deed dated 24.12.1979. They
that in order to
defeat his rights of pre-emption, it was camouflaged as a gift. He further
claimed the market value of the property ... pre-empt
the transaction by submitting that there was no sale and rather, it was a
gift by way of gift deed dated 24.12.1979. They
that in order to
defeat his rights of pre-emption, it was camouflaged as a gift. He further
claimed the market value of the property ... pre-empt
the transaction by submitting that there was no sale and rather, it was a
gift by way of gift deed dated 24.12.1979. They
Although an appeal can be filed against the judgment
of the Tribunal, pre-deposit to the extent of 75 % of the
demand is imperative ... parties
like in the cases of partition, cancellation of sale deed,
gift deed, right of pre-emption, redemption of mortgage
etc. and the bar contained
plaintiff had a superior right
of pre-emption to pre-empt the sale being a co-sharer in the land in dispute
at the time ... alleged that the plaintiff had already
gifted away the property in dispute through gift deed and therefore, the
plaintiff had waived her right to exercise
father of the
plaintiffs by way of gift deed and had also delivered the
possession of the plot. Since Ramji Lal, grand father of
defendants ... Bhog Ram
RSA No.5606 of 2003 5
executed the gift deed in favour of the plaintiffs vide gift deed dated
13.5.1947. Bhana
claims they have superior right of pre-emption on the ground that as per
PEPSU custom, the sale is pre-emptable by a co-sharer ... Sheo Chand had gifted 2 kanals
land in favour of defendant no.1 to 4 by virtue of gift deed dated
15.06.1989 and thereafter
executed by the vendee in favour of another prospective pre-emption with an equal right of pre-emption and subsequent to the institution ... Devi, the original vendee, with a notice of pre-emption. She, in recognition of his right of pre-emption, transferred the house by executing
