Syal (supra), the accused, who was a Director of M/s.
Golden Forests (India) Ltd, allegedly cheated a large number of investors.
Several FIRs were
registered by the respondent on
26.07.2016 against M/s. Pearls Golden Forest Limited (PGF), M/s. Pearl
Agrotek Corporation Limited (PACL); and certain directors
Parkash v. M/s Golden Forest
India Ltd., 2008 (4) R.C.R. (Cr.) 445. I have gone through all these
judgments, which fully apply
Parkash v. M/s Golden Forest
India Ltd., 2008 (4) R.C.R. (Cr.) 445. I have gone through all these
judgments, which fully apply
Parkash v. M/s Golden Forest
India Ltd., 2008 (4) R.C.R. (Cr.) 445. I have gone through all these
judgments, which fully apply
independent section. See 2002 (2) CPC
536 Punjab M/s. Golden Forests (India) Ltd. Versus
Satwinder Bedi. See 2008 (1) CPC 45 Delhi High Court
Singh,
PS Jaffarpur Kalan.
Mr. Harpawan Kumar Arora,
Advocate for Committee
Golden Forests (P) Ltd.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
JUDGMENT
Criminal Law Journal 3136; Om Parkash vs. M/s Golden Forest
India Ltd and others, 2008(4)R.C.R. (Criminal) 445; Punjab State
Civil
further contended that the money was invested in the Golden Forest India Pvt. Ltd. and receipt was given to the opposite party no. 2. That ... wholly mischievous and malafide. None of the other investors of Golden Forest India Pvt. Ltd. have lodged any complaint against the applicant. The applicant
Punjab and Haryana High Court in Omprakash Vs.
M/s Golden Forest India Ltd. and others, 2008(4) R.C.R. (Cr.) 445,
in which