Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Surendra Mahto vs The State Of Bihar Through The Chief ... on 25 October, 2021 Author

imprisonment for twenty years. 49. We may point out that in Gopal Vinayak Godse v. State of Maharastra, (AIR 1961 SC 600), the Supreme Court ... life would, ordinarily, mean, in the light of the decision in Gopal Vinayak Godse (supra), imprisonment for whole of the remaining period of the convicted

premise reliance is placed on the line of decisions beginning from Gopal Vinayak Godse v. State of Maharashtra23 and coming down to Mohd. Munna

Code. This is so in view of the authoritative pronouncement in Gopal Vinayak Godse's case , which holds the field. Therefore, however long

imprisonment for the remainder of life, as was held in Gobind Gopal Vinayak Godse v. State of Maharashtra . It was further held that the period

violation of Section 53 of the Indian Penal Code. (xi) In Gopal Vinayak Godse v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. , reported

Supreme Court after consideration of earlier judgments in Gopal Vinayak Godse Vs. State of Maharashtra ; (1961) 3 SCR 440, Dalbir Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Supreme Court after consideration of earlier judgments in Gopal Vinayak Godse Vs. State of Maharashtra ; (1961) 3 SCR 440, Dalbir Singh Vs. State of Punjab

reprieves or suspension of sentence is purely an executive function (see Gopal Vinayak Godse v. State of Maharashtra [1961] 3 SCR 440; Maru

reprieves or suspension of sentence is purely an executive function (see Gopal Vinayak Godse v. State of Maharashtra [1961] 3 SCR 440; Maru