Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

failure of the petitioner was subsequently placed on record by the respondent­ GPSC on oath by filing affidavit dated 24.04.2019, stating that the petitioner

that the petitioner had failed in the interview. 4. Respondent No.1 - GPSC has filed additional affidavit­in­reply dated 06.09.2018, placing on record this

PLEADER for Respondents 1-2 MR DG SHUKLA for Respondent No.3 - GPSC MR BS SUPEHIA, ADVOCATE for Respondents No.4 to 31 - Original Petitioners

State Government is directed to file reply within two weeks and the GPSC shall bring the sealed cover containing the result of the petitioners which

whereas learned advocate MS. Roopal R. Patel appears for respondent No.­2­GPSC. 2. In this Civil Application what is prayed by the applicants­original

State Government is directed to file reply within two weeks and the GPSC shall bring the sealed cover containing the result of the petitioners which

appointments of 374 APPs as per the revised requisition sent by the GPSC would not be proceeded with. However, in light of the aforementioned order

order dated 09.07.2018 passed by this Court, learned advocate for the respondent­GPSC brought the result of the interview of the petitioner in a sealed ... petitioner. After opening the sealed cover, learned advocate for the respondent­GPSC made a statement that the petitioner has been unsuccessful in the interview

13116/2017 ORDER selected either by the GPSC or under the centralised recruitment scheme. It is provided therein that if any employee is appointed ... cadre and if he subsequently gets selected either on regular basis by GPSC or under the centralised recruitment and if there is no gap between

examination has passed on 4.4.2019. In absence of any opposition from the GPSC, without treating it as a precedent, the petitioner is permitted to appear