that the existing issue may be resolved:-
1) Whether the grading system followed by the respondents is contrary to what has been provided ... Public Grievances & Pensions, the following grading points have been provided:-
Sl.No. APAR Grading Equivalent Grading Points
1. 8 to 10 Outstanding
Good, 2.5 for Good and 0 for others. This type of grading system has been uniformly applied for all the candidates by the respondents ... ACRs and downgraded ACRs, as in our considered opinion the prescribed grading system has been neutral to all candidates and designed in such a manner
APAR system had not been adopted by the official respondents, the system of assessment under the said OM for numerical grading under the said ... Reports (ACR). In the said APAR system, the Reporting and Reviewing officers were required to give numerical grading to officers reported upon on various attributes
aggregate shall be considered equivalent to first class/division. If a Grade Point system is adopted the CGPA will be converted into equivalent marks ... University with atleast 55% marks (or an equivalent grade in a point scale wherever grading system is followed) at the Masters degree level
shall be Member.
considered
equivalent to first
class/division. If a
Grade Point system
is adopted the CGPA
will be converted
into equivalent
marks ... University with
atleast 55% marks
(or an equivalent
grade in a point
scale wherever
grading system is
followed) at the
Master's degree
level
Year
(period) Overall grading by Reporting Officer
(with date) Overall Grading by Reviewing Authority
(with date) Grading by the Accepting Authority
(with date ... years reveals the following: (i) There was 3 stage grading system up to end of 2002 and thereafter 2 stage grading is in vogue
points system as in the case of Railways may be introduced. Candidates short-listed for further consideration after the first screening would be graded ... merit. The Selection Committee has followed a transparent score based CR grading system by which even up to 3 decimals have been worked out. Respondents
been conferred with the appointment. While assessing the mark position, a grading system was adopted for streamlining academic appointments.
11. However, since it is admitted
respondents have allowed the below benchmark grading to continue in his ACRs. His further submission is that by grading him as Fair in the ACRs ... mistake, entry like Fair does not figure in the ACR overall grading system. Hence, his plea is that such entries should be ignored
pending before the respondent-Department. The respondent-Department had devised a grading system on a hundred point scale by taking into account various parameters, such
