Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

decided by the said order and the same was passed merely granting interim bail to the appellant and, therefore, there could have been no occasion

Sidhu, in this case was dismissed vide order dated 01.11.2021. This second bail application has been filed by  the applicant-Sh.Gurpreet Singh Sidhu ... holder(s),  we are of the considered view that we can grant interim bail to Sh.Gurpreet  Singh Sidhu upto 15.08.2022, so that the remaining

advance, the respondent moved bail application under Section 438 Cr. P.C. for the grant of anticipatory bail to the appellant in the Court ... moving an application for grant of anticipatory bail and respondent after receiving Rs.5,000/- moved application and interim bail was allowed by the Additional

Forum on executing NBW they were remanded to MCR refusing to grant bail. Therefore the petitioners apprehend that if they would appear before the Forum ... proceedings. 11. Secondly, though the Hon'ble Apex Court by its interim order directed to start recovery proceedings by attachment of movable

Tribunal, Hazaribag claiming Rs.6,60,000/-. The Claims Tribunal passed interim order granting Rs.50,000/- to be paid to the claimants. The appellant ... spent for release of the vehicle and getting bail. 3. The complainant-appellant, in total, claimed Rs.7,03,800/- besides compensation

Commission at Chandigarh vide order dated 21.04.2022 has been pleased to grant interim arrangement for visiting the site of the project i.e. Premium Trinity ... Crores to different decree holders in different cases. 17 4. All the bail applications were contested by the decree holders/ respondents. 5. We have heard

Mr Amir Ali Tharani vs Mr Rajesh Sukhtnkar on 27 September, 2010 BEFORE THE HON

The Chandigarh S.B.O.P. Employees ... vs Avtar Singh Saini on 23 February, 2022

Javvadi Srinivas, vs M/S. Maytas Properties Ltd., on 27 April, 2012 BEFORE THE A

Vijaya Health Centre vs K. Karibeeran (Deceased) & Ors. on 25 March, 2026 IN THE