submitted that the Respondent No.3-
Workman was a habitual absentee and for which a
3
Neutral Citation No.
( 2025:JHHC:21930 ).
domestic enquiry ... clear that Respondent No.3
was dismissed on the ground of habitual absenteeism or
not. Although the learned counsel for the petitioner-
company has taken
services of the petitioner-Company
on 18.04.1983. Since, he was a habitual absentee, the petitioner-Company was
forced to weed him out from the service ... admitted his guilt. Learned counsel further
argues that workman was a habitual absentee and earlier on three occasions
punishments were inflicted for his misconduct, though
days
14. Therefore, it is established that the appellant was a habitual
absentee without leave and, therefore, he does not deserve any
sympathy from this ... impress upon us that the respondent had not been a habitual absentee.
We really fail to fathom the said submission when the respondent had
remained
days
14. Therefore, it is established that the appellant was a habitual
absentee without leave and, therefore, he does not deserve any
sympathy from this ... impress upon us that the respondent had not been a
habitual absentee. We really fail to fathom the said submission
when the respondent had remained
held that an employee who is a habitual absentee without leave,
does not deserve any sympathy from the Court.
9. In the case The Govt ... disciplined force and if the delinquent
employee is an habitual absentee then there is no reason to ignore the fact
of earlier habitual absenteeism
traffic department. On the allegations that he was an habitual
absentee, he was charge sheeted on 12/04/1991 for remaining unauthorizedly absent
from duty ... appearing for the petitioner submitted
that the concerned workman was a habitual absentee and he accepted the misconduct
and, therefore, considering his past conduct, there
impugned order the Disciplinary Authority has taken
a ground of habitual absenteeism, but as per his
instruction there was no specific charge of the same ... such averment that there was no
charge with regard to habitual absenteeism. Moreover,
even the charge-sheet has not been annexed.
6. Further, from perusal
Learned counsel for
the respondents management submits that the petitioner was habitual
absentee from service from time to time and in the year ... participated and was
found guilty of the charges of being a habitual absentee. In these
circumstances, the order of dismissal and the award upholding
concerned workman, Kedar Mahato) was a habitual absentee. He was absent for 75 days during the months of July to September, 1986 and again from ... respondent No. 2 has not improved his conduct and remains a habitual absentee. In the same paragraph they have further inter alia, stated as follows
already accepted his guilt and kept mum for
long years. The habitual absenteeism cannot be encouraged by taking
lenient view. During the last three years
