that too repeated unauthorized absence as the respondent-
plaintiff was a habitual absentee.
Similarly, in Prakash Chand (supra), the benefit was extended
in favour ... settled in Ashok Kumar Singh 's case (supra) qua
habitual absentees.
The facts and circumstances in the cases being relied upon by
the learned
dated 14.10.2015. In short, the three
charges were as follows:-
1) Habitual absenteeism
2) Remaining on unauthorised absent from duty
intermittently for a period ... Article I of the
charge that the DGS was an habitual absentee and that the charge
was proved.
5. Similarly, in the case
Tribunal, contending that the
appellant was gainfully employed; that she was habitually absentee; that
rt
her conduct and behaviour was not good; that she used ... cited by the Counsel for the
respondents, was a case of habitual absentee who was absent for a period
of 105 days and was dismissed
petitioner on the allegations of unauthorized absence and also being a habitual
absentee. The said notice was accompanied by a statement of allegation with
list ... without jurisdiction.
(iv) There is no discussion on the allegations of
habitual absentee in the Enquiry Report and the same has
been presumed on basis
been passed against the husband of the petitioner as he was habitual absentee without any sanctioned leave for a long period and thereafter, recording ... orders and come to the conclusion that the petitioner is a habitual absentee without taking leave and was awarded punishment several times after suspension
review-applicant remained absent on
earlier occasions also and was a habitual absentee and was punished
earlier also qua said allegations. Learned counsel ... dismissal of the plaintiff. He further
argued that the plaintiff was habitual absentee and he
remained absent from his duty on number of occasions
shows that he is an incorrigible type of person
and a habitual absentee.
The above act on the part of Const. Rajesh, No. 1211 ... which
shows that he is an incorrigible person and a habitual absentee.
6
OA No. 1217/2020
Item No.28/C-2
Accordingly
statement
made in the written statement that the respondent was a
habitual absentee during his short period of service and has
concluded therefrom that
Suresh Puri vs State Bank Of India & Ors on 5 January, 2023
Author: V
force is a
disciplined force and if the respondent is a habitual
absentee then there is no reason to ignore this fact at
the time
