perform watch and ward duty, stated that he was habitual
absentee from duty and was to remain absent from duty.
Respondent further claimed before ... that
petitioner-workman was not performing his duty properly and was
habitual absentee. While placing reliance upon the documents,
.
RW-1 stated that since
unauthorised habitual absence exceeding
21 consecutive days. In the enquiry conducted, though it was
found that he was a habitual absentee, the allegation that ... though the first respondent can
be held to be guilty of habitual absenteeism, the allegation that
he was absent for 21 consecutive days
days on 18 different occasions and as such, he is a habitual absentee. It
2 of 8
::: Downloaded ... from duty. The facts would demonstrate that the petitioner is a
habitual absentee. Mere non-mentioning of the expression as regards the
petitioner being guilty
They have further submitted that applicant's husband was a
habitual absentee and prior to issue of Memorandum dated 16.09.2008,
he was penalized ... this case is that applicant's husband is a
habitual absentee and remained absent for nearly 4 years and was
punished for that purpose
held as under:
"16. Indisputably, the respondent was a habitual absentee. He in his explanation, in answer to the charge-sheet pleaded guitly admitting
under:
The respondents workmen were served with charge
sheets of habitual absenteeism on 15.06.2006, to which the
respondents workmen filed their explanation ... order
was passed against the respondents workmen on the ground of
habitual absenteeism without authorized leave sanctioned by
the Management and a Domestic Enquiry
came
to the conclusion that plaintiff-respondent is "habitual absentee" and
"incorrigible type of a person" and does not deserve ... perusal of his previous service record reveals
that he is a habitual absentee and incorrigible type of a person".
xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
declaring him "unlikely to prove an
efficient police officer, being habitual absentee, negligent
to his duty and in disciplined, has held:
"It would ... considered the record and found him to be
habitual absentee, negligent to his duty and indisciplined.
The findings of habitual absence and indiscipline would
punishment awarded
by the Labour Court, as the petitioner is a habitual absentee
and he had earlier been warned to be careful by order dated
that case of the respondents
that the appellant is a habitual absentee. He had to proceed on leave under
compulsion because of his grave condition
