Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2808 (1.15 seconds)

Pala Ram vs State Of Punjab on 3 February, 2009

prosecutrix. The possibility of the prosecutrix being accustomed to habitual intercourse cannot be ruled out. I had not received the report of Ossification test ... deposed that "the possibility of the prosecutrix being accustomed to habitual intercourse cannot be ruled out. " This evidence speaks volumes of the prosecutrix
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of H.P vs Suresh Kumar @ Dc on 29 May, 2009

doctor has categorically stated that the prosecutrix was not habitual of sexual intercourse because her vagina admitted only one finger. The doctor, however, admitted that ... submitted by the respondent - accused that the prosecutrix was habitual to sexual intercourse since her hymen was absent. The aforesaid statement of the respondent also
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 99 - M Sharma - Full Document

The State Of Jharkhand vs Shailendra Kumar Rai @ Pandav Rai on 31 October, 2022

fingers in her vagina meant that she was habituated to sexual intercourse. She also denied the defence’s suggestion that she prepared the medical report ... integrity and dignity.” 62. Whether a woman is “habituated to sexual intercourse” or “habitual to sexual intercourse” is irrelevant for the purposes of determining whether
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 19 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next