Aneeta Hada vs M/S Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt.Ltd on 8 May, 2008
Equivalent citations ... Sirpurkar
CASE NO.:
Appeal (crl.) 838 of 2008
PETITIONER:
Aneeta Hada
RESPONDENT:
M/s Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt.Ltd.
DATE OF JUDGMENT
Aneeta Hada vs M/S Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt.Ltd on 27 April, 2012
Equivalent citations: (2012) 2 UC 1032, AIR 2012 SUPREME COURT ... INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 838 OF 2008
Aneeta Hada .....……..Appellant
Versus
M/s. Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt. Ltd. ………Respondent
WITH
CRIMINAL
Anil Hada vs Indian Acrylic Limited on 26 November, 1999
Equivalent citations: AIR 2000 SUPREME COURT ... Mohapatra
CASE NO.:
Appeal (crl.) 1258-63 of 1999
PETITIONER:
ANIL HADA
RESPONDENT:
INDIAN ACRYLIC LIMITED
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/11/1999
BENCH
concerned, the High Court relying on decision of this Court
in Anil Hada v. Indian Acrylic Ltd. , (2000) 1 SCC 1, held that the
proceeding ... raised and considered by two Judge Bench of this
Court in Anil Hada v. India Acrylic Ltd. (2000) 1 SCC 1. This Court held
diligence to prevent the commission of the
offence.”
(Emphasis added)
In Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels and Tours Private
Limited,2 this Court had reiterated ... limiting the interpretation of C.V. Parekh (supra), this Court in Anil
Hada v. Indian Acrylic Ltd.11 had held that:
“13. If the offence
Hada And Ors. vs The Binny Ltd. Staff Association on 19 November, 1987
Equivalent citations: ILR1987KAR3762, (1988)ILLJ405KANT
JUDGMENT
Prem Chand Jain ... Labour Commissioner or under its or his authority ?"
2. S. N. Hada and others have filed these petitions for the quashing of the order
dent in the
prosecution case. Relying on the decision in Aneeta Hada v.
M/s.Godfather Travels and Tours ... this Court
took note of the two Judge Bench decision in Anil Hada v.
Indian Acrylic Ltd. [(2000) 1 SCC 1], wherein it was held
view of law laid down by this court in 'Aneeta Hada v.
Godfather Travels and Tours Private Limited ... prosecution against the appellant was void
ab-initio.
In Aneeta Hada 's case [2012 (5) SCC 661], the Court,
inter alia, held
their various statements are as under :
(i) Mr. Madan Hada
(a) Statement recorded by the ADI, on 8th Nov., 1996 (photocopy ... assessee's paper book).
(ii) Mr. Deepak Hada
(a) Statement recorded by ADI on 10th Nov., 1996 (copy available at p. 204 of assessee
advocate, after taking me through the
judgment in the case of Aneeta Hada (supra), submitted
that section 141 refers to section ... interpreted
to mean authorised signatory, it will turn the decision in
Aneeta Hada (supra) on its head.
(xiii) Learned senior advocate endeavoured to rely