forth that the Hal Plot No. 7 also
included portions of Sabik Plot Nos. 137 and 140 and thereby Hal Plot No. 7
with ... decimal comprising of plot No. 145 (Ac.1.116
decimals), plot No. 148(Ac.1.147), plot No. 155 (Ac.0.440) executed in
favour
forth that the Hal Plot No. 7 also included portions of Sabik Plot Nos.
137 and 140 and thereby Hal Plot No. 7 with ... decimal comprising of plot No.
145 (Ac.1.116 decimals), plot No. 148(Ac.1.147), plot No.
155 (Ac.0.440) executed in favour
Hal Plot No.1410 Ac.0.198
decimals under Hal Khata No.224 and Hal Plot No.1450
Ac.0.65 decimals under Hal Khata ... under Hal Khata No.224 in his
favour exclusively in the Hal Settlement of the year 1970 and
whereas, only the suit Hal Plot
part
of Sabik Plot No.116 but not the part of Sabik Plot No.165.
Sabik Plot No.116 corresponds to Hal Plot ... decimals in Hal R.o.R under Hal Khata No.102. He has no claim over
Sabik Plot No.165. Sabik Plot No.165 might
bhogra conversion
proceeding, the said two plots vide Plot Nos.473 and 470 along with other
plots were settled in the name of the father ... plaintiff, the aforesaid two suit plots vide Plot Nos.473
and 470 along with other plots left by his father had devolved upon him
(plaintiff
defendants - opp.
Parties from undertaking any construction in Hal khata no. 318,
under Hal plot no. 270 in mouza Cuttack Sahar, Unit No. 35,
Jhangirimangala ... boundary wall existing between Hal
Plot No. 270 of Hal khata No. 318 and Hal plot no.
271 of Hal khata No. 444 of Mouza
been erroneously included in the Plot
No.1575 under Hal Khata No.481 and Hal Plot No.1563 under Hal
Khata ... under Hal Khata No.482.
Both the suit Hal Khatas vide Hal Khata Nos.481 and 482 have
been recorded in the Hal Settlement
eastern boundary of her Plot
No.256. Defendant No.2 being the adjacent plot owner of Hal Plot
No.257 had not come forward ... Eastern portion about 6' X
80') under Hal Khata No.22)
AND
Hal Plot No.257 (Western portion about
land of the members
of the two branches. The land under Hal plot no.450 measuring Ac0.24
decimal however continues to be recorded ... also not
in dispute that Hal plot no.400 corresponds to sabik plot no.289 and 290
whereas Hal Plot No.450 corresponds to sabik
consideration of Ext.C (Plot Index) is correct in not holding
that Sabik Plot No.71/1/108 corresponds to Hal Plot ... Hal
Plot Nos.329, 331, 332 and 333. It is not in his report that Sabik Plot
No.71 corresponds to Plot
