opinion of the Central Forensic Science Laboratory ('CFSL') on the handwriting on the cheques in question despite an application filed by the complainant ... respondent for sending the cheques in question for the opinion of a handwriting expert.
6. The Crl Rev. Petition No. 44 of 2006 filed
Court led evidence of as many as
seven witnesses including of a handwriting expert. The objectors
examined four witnesses including their handwriting experts. The
witnesses ... Will Ex.P-1 was executed. PW-7
was the handwriting expert Sh. M.K. Mehta who gave his opinion with
respect to the signatures
L.K. Advani vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 1 April, 1997
Equivalent citations: 1997IIIAD
Central Forensic Science Laboratory ('CFSL') for its opinion on the handwriting on the cheques.
2. The cheques in question ... seeking reference of the cheques to the CFSL for opinion on the handwriting therein claiming that "the report of CFSL experts will falsify
cartridges were recovered at the instance of
accused Ramesh.
10. The specimen handwriting of Sapan Haldar S1 to S6 vide memo ... obtained by the Police. Thereafter the specimen handwritings were
sent to the FSL, Malviya Nagar, for comparison with the threat letter,
ransom note as well
amended on 23.06.2006 which provision permits the court to direct taking of handwriting samples even in the course of investigation. Therefore, he drew a parallel ... Secondly, he submits that the provisions of Section 311A only refer to handwriting and have no reference to the voice samples or voice recordings. Therefore
accused under
section 243(2) Cr. P.C. for examination of handwriting expert in order
to prove that the cheque in question, which formed ... respondent/accused earlier filed two
applications for the same purpose for examining handwriting expert for
disproving her signatures on the cheque in question, and both
written or signed, the
opinion of any person acquainted with the
handwriting of the person by whom it is
supposed to be written or signed ... relevant fact.
Explanation.-- A person is said to be
acquainted with the handwriting of
another person when he has seen that
person write, or when
expert's opinion on admitted and
questioned document, regarding handwriting of the
accused persons, goes unchallenged.
In the case law reported as Murari ... reliable evidence
through a doubt, the uncorroborated testimony of a
handwriting expert may be accepted.‖
(xiii) Ex.DW3/P-18 letter dated
firm of the accused,
addressed to the bank manager, in the handwriting and under
the signatures of the accused viz. the letters ... state the said registers
contained entries stated to be in the handwriting of the
accused when he filled up the relevant columns of the
registers
