proved to be written in the handwriting of the defendant. There is direct evidence of the handwriting of the defendant and the plaintiff also produced ... handwriting expert PW-3 Krishna Charan to prove the handwriting of the defendant over Ex. 1, Ex. 2 and Ex. 3. The defendant even
entries in Ex. P. 66, except A to B, were in his handwriting. It is in the evidence of Raghunandan that it was his first ... should have, in the normal course of business, been in the handwriting of the accused or, at any rate, in the handwriting of the witness
January, 1928, an acknowledgment of the payment appears in the handwriting of, or in a writing signed by, the person making the payment ... acknowledgment of the payment can be valid if it is in the handwriting of duly authorised agent of the debtor even when part payment
every other part of such document, which purports to be in the handwriting of any particular person, is in that person's handwriting ... that the signature and other parts of the document are in the handwriting of the person who is shown to have signed or written
accused persons were arrested and the specimen handwritings and signatures of accused Gopi Ram. Arjan. Dass and Man Singh were obtained. The disputed document ... issued to Gopi Ram bearing Roll No. 16752. Shri Bhanagay PW/8, Handwriting Expert has, clearly stated that the surface of Ex. P/6.marked
that Ex.-1 the letter dated 11-12-1960 was in the handwriting of defendant Jatan Mal. The expert opinion of A. S. Kapoor ... favour of the defendant that the letter was not in the handwriting of defendant. That opinion came on record as Ex. DW/3/3, Apart
plaintiffs' ancestor and that he was acquainted with the handwriting of said Heerachand. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that ... witness was born and, therefore, he could not possibly identify his handwriting and the conditions laid down in Section 47 of Indian Evidence Act -- before
Evidence Act. It was stated that cheque was not issued under one handwriting and ink, thus needs to be sent for FSL/handwriting expert ... matter, revisional Court came to the conclusion that petitioner never questioned handwriting of the cheque by different person or under different bank while the complainant
prove that this receipt Ex. P. 9 is written in the handwriting of the petitioner. PW. 1 Brij Bhushan Lal auditor stated that ... know and could not identify the handwriting of the petitioner. PW. 2 Mohd. Rafi Girdawar, who was the immediate Senior Officer of the petitioner
sometimes admissible. Section 47 deals only with the question of identification of handwriting. By it handwriting may be proved by the opinion of any person ... acquainted with the handwriting of the person alleged to have written the document. Section 47 reads as under:
47. Opinion as to handwriting when relevant
