report cannot be based for canceling the candidature and the report could not have been taken into consideration. The report of the Handwriting Expert ... report of GEQD, and that the respondents committed gross illegality in placing reliance on the report of SSC based on the report of handwriting expert
were sent to CFSL,
Shimla for forensic examination and report. As per the report of
CFSL, Shimla, the specimen signatures and thumb impressions
of three ... examination. It is correct
that in both the reports, he did not examine any handwriting or
signatures. He had examined only the thumb impression
regarding sending of the seized letters to handwriting expert. But these original letters and handwriting expert report were not filed by the prosecution during ... time to examine witness Komalbai and to produce letters and handwriting expert report which are very important and material evidence for just decision
court is
unsustainable for the following reasons:-
"a. A negative handwriting expert report cannot be a ground for
discharge since the handwriting/signatures ... Evidence Act, 1872 which is
during trial.
b. Handwriting expert report has to be proved during trial and
cannot be held to be conclusive
court is
unsustainable for the following reasons:-
"a. A negative handwriting expert report cannot be a ground for
discharge since the handwriting/signatures ... Evidence Act, 1872 which is
during trial.
b. Handwriting expert report has to be proved during trial and
cannot be held to be conclusive
court is
unsustainable for the following reasons:-
"a. A negative handwriting expert report cannot be a ground for
discharge since the handwriting/signatures ... Evidence Act, 1872 which is
during trial.
b. Handwriting expert report has to be proved during trial and
cannot be held to be conclusive
Suo Moto In The Matter Of The State Of M.P. vs Complainant/Prosecutrix on
prove the said report while the defendant no.1/1 had filed the report of handwriting expert Anup Sinha (Paper ... appeared as a witness (DW-1) to prove his report. The report of the handwriting expert Vishan Kumar Sharma clearly mentions that Dori
witnesses was recorded. Alongwith
complaint, complainant had filed, Shri Ulhas Athale, handwriting expert
report dated 02.07.2012 showing that the cheques issued were signed by
accused ... Ulhas Athale, handwriting expert was recorded on
16.07.2015 and the documents Ex.P/30, P/31 which are handwriting
expert's report, his opinion
with admitted signatures of applicant were
sent to handwriting expert. Before report from handwriting expert could
be received, charge-sheet was filed and applicant ... from handwriting expert has been
received in which it has been opined that the disputed signature and
handwriting is not in the handwriting and signature
