Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2436 (0.42 seconds)

State vs . Pushpa & Others on 26 March, 2011

Section 498A . When it is not followed by any cruelty or harassment, as defined in Section 498 ­A of IPC . 20. Smt.Sarla Prabhakar Waghmare ... Section 498A . When it is not followed by any cruelty or harassment, as defined in Section 498A IPC. 24. Now as far as the allegations
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ramesh Chand Sharma vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 15 December, 2018

investment in shares.    In order   to   constitute   cruelty   or   harassment   against   accused   persons, there should be specific allegations against each individual, but from the narration ... point   of   time,   with   regard   to   cruelty   or   harassment defined/explained   in   section   498A   IPC,   it  does   not   make   out   charge against the petitioner
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dr. Rini Johar vs State Of M.P.&Ors. on 3 June, 2016

dealing with the harassment in custody, deliberating on the concept of harassment, the Court stated thus:- “22. At this juncture, it becomes absolutely necessary ... meant by the term “harassment”. In P. Ramanatha Aiyar’s Law Lexicon, 2nd Edn., the term “harass” has been defined thus: “Harass.—‘Injure’ and ‘injury
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - D Misra - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next