Cbi vs (1) Ramesh Chand, Nala Beldar, on 23 January, 2019
IN THE COURT OF
Cbi vs Nasib Singh Constable on 19 January, 2019
IN THE COURT OF ANIL KUMAR
Cbi vs Ravinder Ram Constable on 19 January, 2019
IN THE COURT OF ANIL KUMAR
testimonies. It was further argued
that PW17 did not mention the hash value of the digital file in his report
and also did not mention
Exhibit-Q1 in unsealed condition from physics
division for computation of hash value and he reported that DVD
Exhibit Q1 was found fully functional ... undamaged and
mentioned its MD5 hash value in his report as Ex. PW-2/A.
In his cross-examination, Ld. Defence counsel asked
about
along with the bank statement records uploaded in the portal with hash value.
In the order, dated 19.04.2022, there is no reference. It is clearly
clip with
a hashtag with date and time stamp with the hash value being
noted in the order passed by the concerned court;
(d) preserving
recorded at the Court point. An encrypted master copy
with hash value shall be retained in the Court as part of the record. Another
copy ... person examined
shall be preserved. An encrypted master copy with hash value shall be
retained as a part of the record.
10 of 12
::: Downloaded
clip with a hashtag with date and time stamp
with the hash value being noted in the order passed
by the concerned court;
(d) preserving ... clip with a hashtag with date and time stamp
with the hash value being noted in the order passed
by the concerned court;
(d) preserving
person examined shall be preserved. An encrypted master
copy with hash value shall be retained as a part of the record.
8.10 The Court