Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

nail and bone grafting have been done. Thereafter, on 29.10.2007, right inguinal hernia mesh repair has been done. Considering the seriousness of the injuries

nail and bone grafting have been done. Thereafter, on 29.10.2007, right inguinal hernia mesh repair has been done. Considering the seriousness of the injuries

limb. Further, it is stated that he was suffering from Incisional Hernia and Mesentric Ischemia for which, he is advised to have life long anti ... Medical Reports produced by the petitioner discloses that he was having Incisional Hernia (Redusaable). When Surgeons Opinion was sought for the same, advise was given

writ petitioner contended that the writ petitioner is suffering from 'Hernia' and had undergone surgery in General Hospital, Chennai. This apart

medical re-examination, he was found to have bilateral hydocoele with paraumbilical hernia and was advised to undergo surgery for Meshplasty + Omphalectomy + Bilateral TVSE. Therefore

case on behalf of both the petitioners. The second petitioner underwent Hernia operation and therefore, they could not appear and contest the suit

writ petitioner states that the writ petitioner is suffering from Left Inguinal Hernia and had undergone a operation for Left Inguinal Hernia