M/S South Indian Stone Industries vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 March, 2008
quiet for more than 2 years anq tnelféaeffi-ii:
placed hexane the Rule 1.1 .4_'comnit;tno
sJ..Nn.11 also which epplicefinn wasV
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (1.07 seconds)M/S Kumar Granites And Marbles vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 March, 2008
quiet for more than 2 years anq tnelféaeffi-ii:
placed hexane the Rule 1.1 .4_'comnit;tno
sJ..Nn.11 also which epplicefinn wasV
C N Kalleshappa vs C M Ambika W/O Late Shanthakumar on 19 March, 2008
they
at""'«._Vtcgr;:feci:'v..:.*id-dress hexane the court at small causes,
V' :'tangai3
Mr B T Vijay vs M/S Luiran on 30 October, 2008
himh is mat grantefi by the trial Court
._$nfi thexefora, asaailed hexane thia Caurt
n"§auld indicate that the presenca ef the said
Yes vs Unknown on 4 February, 2008
effect that CIXON remains CIXON even after the removal of N-Hexane. However, he has observed that from the facts mentioned in the preceding paragraphs
Kamani Oil Industries vs The Commissioner Of Central Excise on 10 July, 2008
that it appears from the records that the entire credit taken on Hexane received in the factory and used in or in relation
1