Article 227 of The Constitution of India against
the notice issued in HMOP No. 706 of 2004 on the file of Principal Judge,
Family Court ... Subba Reddy
^For Respondent : Mr. B.B. Venkatesan
:ORDER
The respondent in HMOP No. 706 of 2004 on the file of Principal
Judge, Family Court
cruelty. One Shankar was also arrayed as the second respondent in the HMOP alleging to be the adulteror. Pending disposal of the HMOP, the petitioner ... revision itself has become infructuous in view of the fact that the HMOP has been disposed of pending disposal of the revision.
7. In this
Section 13 (1) (i-a) of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 , in HMOP No.500 of 2012 pending on the file of the Sub Court ... petitioner is the wife of the respondent. The respondent has filed HMOP No.500 of 2012 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tambaram
that the review petitioner had originally filed a petition for divorce in HMOP.No.467 of 2006 as against the respondent herein on the file ... transferred to the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore and renumbered as HMOP.No.10 of 2007. The respondent had also filed another application for restitution
ground of
http://www.judis.nic.in
3
desertion in HMOP.No.338 of 2005.
● The revision petitioner had resisted this ... ground of
cruelty. The respondent had elaborated on the pleadings made in
HMOP.No.338 of 2005 by listing out the various instances which
caused
cruelty. One Shankar was also arrayed as the second respondent in the HMOP alleging to be the adulteror. Pending disposal of the HMOP, the petitioner ... revision itself has become infructuous in view of the fact that the HMOP has been disposed of pending disposal of the revision.
7. In this
cruelty. One Shankar was also arrayed as the second respondent in the HMOP alleging to be the adulteror. Pending disposal of the HMOP, the petitioner ... revision itself has become infructuous in view of the fact that the HMOP has been disposed of pending disposal of the revision.
7. In this
threshold. The facts of the said case are that the respondent in HMOP No.706 of 2004 on the file of Principal Judge, Family Court ... filed revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The said HMOP was filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution
respondent/husband filed a petition for divorce against the revision petitioner in HMOP No.149 of 2016 on the file of the Principal Family Judge ... allowed the both applications and impleaded the second respondent herein in the HMOP. No.149 of 2016. Aggrieved against the said orders passed
Constitution of India praying to strike off the petition in HMOP.No.65 of 2012 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sankari.
For Petitioner ... This revision is at the instance of the respondent in HMOP.No.65 of 2012 to struck off the original petition.
2. In the Court
