right of renewal.
(d) The picking out the petitioner for hostile discrimination by resolution dated 30th August, 2000 clearly indicates that the petitioner was picked ... petitioner's lease due on 1st October, 2000. The hostile discrimination is evident from the fact that even though hotels and cinema occurred together
substantiate a clear cut basis of equivalence and the resultant hostile discrimination before becoming eligible to claim rights on par with the group ... unexplained and cannot be justified on any ground. To illustrate this hostile discrimination copy of the Muster Roll of the work Khurban was placed
prohibiting entry of new distilleries is a policy that leads to hostile discrimination violating the petitioner's rights under Article 14 of the Constitution
undertakings. The petitioners, therefore, submit that they have been victims of hostile discrimination at the hands of the State respondents.
3. The State respondents ... extended to the employees of other public sector undertakings amounts to hostile discrimination and the sane cannot stand. He further states that the Officers
October, 1997, insofar as it pertains to the petitioners, amounts to hostile discrimination and, as such, is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution ... October, 1997, insofar as it pertains to the petitioners amounts to hostile discrimination in view of the fact that in other departments, including Directorate
they are picked up for hostile discrimination while other persons who are similarly situated like the appellant who are also in receipt of interest ... which are similarly situated like the appellant are picked up for hostile discrimination while other, persons who are similarly situated like the appellant
they are picked up for hostile discrimination while other persons who are similarly situated like the appellant who are also in receipt of interest ... which are similarly situated like the appellant are picked up for hostile discrimination while other persons who are similarly situated like the appellant
they are picked up for hostile discrimination while other persons who are similarly situated like the appellant who are also in receipt to interest ... which are similarly situated like the appellant are picked up for hostile discrimination while other persons who are similarly situated like the appellant
Hariharan and Anr. and contended that there is a hostile discrimination meted out to the applicants in comparison to the similarly situated officials placed ... Counsel on P.V. Hariharan's case to contend of hostile discrimination, in our view, is misplaced.
8A. On the other hand learned Counsel
substantiate a clear cut basis of equivalence
and a resultant hostile discrimination before becoming
eligible to claim rights on a par with the other group
