Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Ashok Chhibber vs Hpgcl Through Managing Director ... on 24 January, 2019 Author: Ritu Bahri Bench: Ritu Bahri IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

Abhishek Goel vs Hpgcl on 19 July, 2019 Author: Harsimran Singh Sethi Bench: Harsimran Singh Sethi CWP-18394 of 2014 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT

Hpgcl And Another vs Sohan Singh And Others on 4 April, 2019 Bench: Krishna Murari , Arun Palli IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ... DATE OF DECISION: 04.04.2019 HPGCL and another .....Appellants versus Sohan Singh and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI, CHIEF JUSTICE

during the relevant period to the Haryana Power Generation Corporation Ltd (the HPGCL), he referred to the analysis and conclusion of the Arbitral Tribunal that ... earlier obligation for the return of banked power that was supplied by HPGCL to the first Respondent under a swap agreement. Consequently, he contended that

issue of income from deemed generation, the same arises when HPGCL does not take power from the power plant of the assessee. In such ... that effect in the agreement entered into between the assessee and HPGCL. There is no dispute about these facts also. Thus, the only question left

fourth Respondent -- Haryana Power Generation Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'HPGCL') on 01.03.2007 requesting for supply of 2000 MW power on long ... sell up to 500 MW power from the Project to HPGCL and to take all necessary steps in this regard including submission of bid, signing

under:- 1. Evaporation of surface moisture 2. Windage losses during transportation HPGCL has coal based Thermal Power Stations located in State of Haryana for generation ... generation of electricity. The major content of Raw Material is Coal. HPGCL is purchasing coal through the subsidiaries of Coal India Ltd. Coal India

Haryana Power Generation Corporation Ltd. Urja Bhawan, C-7, Sector 6, HPGCL, Panchkula 134 009, Haryana (through its Managing Director) Page 1 of 36 Order ... generator (Lanco) on the one hand and retail supplier/distributor (HPPC/HPGCL) on the other. In such circumstances, the computation of energy charges carried

paid because there was difference in quantity as recorded by DHBVN and HPGCL from the total purchase 2227 crores. The reconciliation error amounts to only

Narender Hooda, learned counsel for the DHBVNL, HPGCL and HVPNL has pointed out that the expression ‗reservation' has to be interpreted by referring