Resettlement Policies
framed by Haryana Urban Development Authority (for short 'the HUDA')
and/or by the State Government from time to time ... Mathias Oram (2010) 11 SCC 269 and Brij Mohan v. HUDA (2011)
2 SCC 29.) The fundamental right of the farmer to cultivation
even sanctioned the
water-connections to the plaintiffs. Defendant No.1-HUDA was stated to be
acting in collusion with defendants ... actual backdrop that the suit had been instituted.
6. Defendant No.1-HUDA filed a written statement stating therein
that the land in question along
member of the Haryana Civil
Service cadre and the Estate Officer of HUDA, has a grievance that
the order of transfer effected ... result of the complaint which the petitioner had
given against the Administrator, HUDA, Parveen Kumar, described
in the official capacity as well as in personal
Huda vs Sunil Gupta on 17 September, 2012
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW
DELHI
REVISION PETITION NO. 2507 of 2012
(Against
the order dated ... 1339/03 of the State
Consumer
Disputes Redressal Commission, HARYANA, PANCHKULA )
HUDA
Through its Estate Officer
Panchkula
HARYANA ..... Petitioner
Vs.
SUNIL GUPTA
Harit Sharma, Advocate and
Ms. Shivani Sharma, Advocate
for HUDA in RFA Nos.3931 ... Deepak Balyan, Advocate for respondent-HUDA
in RFA Nos.2315 to 2317, 2319 to 2342 of 2005.
Mr. Pradip Bhandari, Advocate and
Mr. Jatinder Kumar
Sidharth Batra, Angel Sharma & Karan Sandhu,
Advocates, for the appellants-HUDA.
Mr. Arun Palli, Senior Advocate, with
M/s Tushar Sharma, Fateh Saini, Arastu ... stipulated period was discussed in the last meeting of the
officers of HUDA held on 25.04.1985 and decided that in future the
calculations of interest
residential-cum-commercial area as shown in
development plan under the HUDA Act . It was followed by a
notification under Section 6 dated 15.11.1984 measuring ... Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority
(hereinafter referred to as 'the HUDA"), Mani Majra (U.T.),
Chandigarh. According to this agreement, land measuring
Administrator, Haryana
Urban Development Authority, Hisar.
3.
The Estate Officer, HUDA, Sirsa.
Appellants
(Ops)
Versus
Sunita Bhatia wife of Surender
Bhatia, Resident of House ... Sector-20, HUDA Colony, Sirsa
Tehsil and District Sirsa.
Respondent (Complainant)
BEFORE:
Honble Mr. Justice R.S. Madan,
President.
Mr. B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member
Supreme Court in New India Public School & others Vs.
HUDA & others AIR 1996 SC 3458 and some of the judgments of this
court ... under:-
"...The individuals/institution should apply to the Estate Officer,
HUDA, Panchkula, on the following proforma with earnest money of
Rs.2500/- in shape
respondents no.1 to 3. Separate
written statement by the Estate Officer, HUDA, Rohtak, was filed on behalf of
respondent no.4. Thereafter, the petitioner ... amount of ` 377.80 crores, which was stated to have been spent by HUDA, on the
development works of the entire Rohtak town
