doctor also failed to mention that
there was a human bite injury caused by respondent no. 2. He argued that
the learned Trial Court ... Revisionist no.
1, the nature of injury was opined as human bite and simple blunt. It has
been mentioned in the ATR that the inquiry
caused injuries on the person of complainant Vijay Mohan with a human
tooth bite on left ear and also caused simple injuries on the person
their possession as was sufficient
to guard any probable danger to human life or any probable danger of
FIR No. 768/08 State Vs. Naveen ... Kumar Page 1/1
grievous hurt and the said dog gave a bite to the complainant as both
the accused sued the dog upon
Jagmohini vs State (Gnct Of Delhi) & Ors. on 6 August, 2013
Author: G.P
Ram Ashish Gaur & Others vs State Of U.P. on 8 July, 2013
Bench
State vs . Omkar Parmar Etc. on 22 November, 2007
IN THE COURT OF SHRI J
Jagsir Singh @ Jagga vs State Of Punjab on 29 August, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023
State By K.R. Pura Police Station vs No: 1. Sri Dhanaraj on 1 February
State vs . 1. Sanjay on 7 May, 2015
1
FIR No. 191/12
PS - Bawana
State vs . Parvez on 13 October, 2010
1
IN THE COURT OF SH. GURDEEP SINGH
