injury no. 1 was simple in nature and was caused by human bite and duration was about 2 days.
He proved the medical report ... prosecutrix. He opined that these injuries were caused by a human bite. In this way this medical evidence also corroborate the version of the prosecution
expressed pain in her right breast, and that there is human bite
mark in her upper lip. The Accident Register issued
crossexamination, he has deposed
that he did not find any human bite mark or any abraison on the
private part of the accused ... categorically deposed that he
did not find any human bite mark or abraison on the private part of the
accused. Thus, the medical evidence also
Lalharia who medically
examined her has mentioned that on external examination i) bite
State V Ramesh
FIR no. 197/11
PS North Rohini Page ... testimony. In FSL report ExPW15/E it is mentioned that human
semen was detected on exhibits:
i) Exhibit 1e: one cotton wool swab
external genitals, perineum, abdomen, chest, back, limbs,
neck and face. Love bite marks are also seen on the
cheeks, neck, and inner thighs ... spared in pursuit
of sexual pleasure. It is a crime against humanity. In
such cases, responsibility on the shoulders of the courts
is more onerous
Irfan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 9 September, 2021
Author: Vivek Rusia
Bench
Aftab Khan vs State Of M.P. on 28 March, 2018
1 CRA-653-2006
Raju Alias Rajaram Son Of Sri Mukundi Lal ... vs State Of U.P. on 21
Jagmohini vs State (Gnct Of Delhi) & Ors. on 6 August, 2013
Author: G.P
Prof. Rama Shankarnarayan Melkote And ... vs State Of A.P. Rep., By Its Principal ... on
