Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 271 (0.77 seconds)

Manoj Kumar vs State on 17 March, 2026

Nidhi Yadav. This MLC recorded, inter alia, the presence of a human bite mark over the left side of the face/cheek of the complainant ... which clearly recorded human bite marks on the left cheek of the complainant, examined the very next day of the incident -- was held to lend
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Suresh on 27 June, 2022

mentioned on the MLC of injured Raj Kumar being caused by human bite could not be ruled out. PW-6 was not cross-examined ... opined that no definitive opinion of human bite could be given. PW-8 was duly cross-examined by Ld. Defence. 12. Thereafter, prosecution evidence
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . 1. Gaurav Yadav, on 28 August, 2018

further deposed that the patient had stated alleged history of human bite on right   forearm.  PW­1   further   deposed   that   on   examination, human bite ... bite   by   accused   Parveen   Yadav saying that accused Parveen Yadav gave a teeth bite on the wrist   of   Joginder/PW3.   The   teeth   bite   further
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Iqbal Singh Etc on 17 November, 2025

injured namely Sh. Arpit Bhalla sustained abrasion on left ring finger (human bite as told by the injured), swelling on occipital region (back side ... provide clear unrelated cause for injuries. PW-5 has confirmed human bite and other injuries as "simple". Testimonies corroborate physical assault and biting
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next