sustained by the complainant could not have been caused by a
human bite.
PW7 Dr. Manoj Dhingra, gave opinion on the MLC of injured ... accused could not
have been given such an injury with human bite or, that he did not
suffer the injury complained of.
Result: Convicted Page
right side of the cheek of the victim was possible by human
bite. No doubt in the cross-examination it is also opined that
injury on lateral aspect of right
upper Arm. As per patient human bite pain in right thigh. Tenderness
present. Vomiting I prescribed some medicine
expressed pain in her right breast, and that there is human bite
mark in her upper lip. The Accident Register issued
opined that injury
No.1 could be caused in a human bite and injury No.2 is
resembling that of an injury caused by nail ... bite mark. According to him,
injury No.1 is a human bite mark and injury Nos. 2 and 3 can be
caused when an assailant
found on the victim's right
cheek was due to human bite. But I am of the view that the
appellant's counsel ... this answer. He
has not ruled out that it is not human bite also. P.W.4 is one
http://www.judis.nic.inKaruppasamy
Exhibit 36, the doctor opined that the
injuries can be of human bite.
11. It is submitted before this Court that in view of
absence ... Report (Exhibit 19)
shows that the said cotton gauze is soaked with human blood.
Further, the quilt seized from the spot was found
about 1:20 pm, she had two human bite marks on her left arm.
The testimony of all the eyewitnesses was tested
someone. The
MLC states the injuries to be semi-circular human bite and the nature of
injuries has been stated to be simple caused ... postmortem report, injury no. 1
was stated to be consistent with human teeth bites and injury no. 2 & 3
FIR No. 184/99 State
simple, however, the MLC affirms that there is a human bite
under the right eye of the complainant.
Arguments on charge qua accused persons have
