Shri Raj Kumar & Ors. vs Shri Ramesh Chander & Ors. on 11 December, 2009
system of multi tier litigation intended to do away with a human error. The appellate
court may in a given case even though finds
Search Results Page
Search Results
241 - 250 of 44643 (6.69 seconds)Dr. P.S. Vetriselvam vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 29 January, 2021
Dr. P.S. Vetriselvam vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 29 January, 2021
Author
M/S Mojika Real Estate & Developers Pvt. ... vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... on 25 November, 2020
133A(1) is stated thus
it is clear that due to human error instead of 133A it was written as
131A in the statement
Dcit -Cc-7(3), Mumbai , Mumbai vs M/S Bhawna Computers Llp, Mumbai on 14 September, 2023
time
of passing the assessment order, that it is just a human
error and need not be construed strictly.
iv. On the argument that provisions
Optimist Electronics P.Ltd, New Delhi vs Ito, Ward-19(2), New Delhi on 31 January, 2023
Optimist Electronics P.Ltd, New Delhi vs Ito, Ward-19(2), New Delhi on 31
Harish Kumar Huf, New Delhi vs Dcit, Circle-34(1), New Delhi on 19 August, 2019
rather it is a case of inaccurate claim due to inadvertent human error.
Therefore, he requested that penalty in dispute may be deleted in view
Shri Vishnu Kumar Bhargava, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-7-3, Jaipur on 19 March, 2018
indicates that the Assessee
made a computation error in its return of income. There is also no
question of the Assessee furnishing any inaccurate particulars ... total
income. This can only be described as a human error which we are all
prone to make. The imposition of penalty on the Assessee
Social Action For Forest & Environment ... vs Union Of India Through Secretary ... on 7 December, 2022
Social Action For Forest & Environment ... vs Union Of India Through Secretary ... on 7 December
Dcit, New Delhi vs M/S Futurz Next Services Ltd.,, New ... on 4 January, 2022
hence undoubtedly, the task would be more
prone to some human errors. In view of the above, there are certain client code
modifications done
Parkar Securities Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax on 19 May, 2006
transactions were done, did not agree for such transaction due to human errors like, not listening correctly regarding buy or sale orders. (Our transactions