Vijay Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 26 May, 2017
Author: Ajai Lamba
Bench
submitted his explanation,
writing that the report is a result of human error, for
which he tendered apologies. When considered, the court
took strong exceptions
consistent with all human probability
that the act must have been done only by the respondents.
15. We find no error being committed
culpable or gross and not the negligence merely based
upon an error of judgment. As pointed out by Lord Atkin
in Andrews v. Director ... State of Punjab :
(2005) 6 SCC 1.
Presumption of innocence is a human right. Such a legal principle
cannot be thrown aside under any situation
accused and it must be such as to show
that within all human probability the act must have been
done by the accused. In spite ... constrained to observe that the Courts below have just
fallen into the error against which, warning was uttered
by Baron Alderson in the above mentioned
proverb 'to err is human' is the recognition of the possibility of making mistakes to which humans are susceptible. A corollary ... defence. No party in a trial can be foreclosed from correcting errors. If proper evidence was not adduced or a relevant material was not brought
culpable or gross and not the negligence merely based upon an error of judgment. As pointed out by Lord Atkin in Andrews v. Director ... Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab .
Presumption of innocence is a human right. Such a legal principle cannot be thrown aside under any situation
Convict vs The State Of Tripura on 1 September, 2021
Author: Arindam Lodh
Bench: Akil
accused and it must be such as to show
that within all human probability the act must have been
done by the accused. In spite ... constrained to observe that the Courts below have just
fallen into the error against which, warning was uttered
by Baron Alderson in the above mentioned
Ranvir Singh vs State Of U.P. on 26 September, 2023
Author: Ashwani Kumar Mishra