discrepancy of 24
votes must have happened due to possible human error on
the part of Presiding Officer of Polling Booth No. 37 in
preparing ... means
appears to be an outcome of an inadvertent human error,
and, the possibility of error on the part of Presiding
Officer of Polling Booth
discrepancy of 24
votes must have happened due to possible human error on
the part of Presiding Officer of Polling Booth No. 37 in
preparing ... means
appears to be an outcome of an inadvertent human error,
and, the possibility of error on the part of Presiding
Officer of Polling Booth
discrepancy of 24
votes must have happened due to possible human error on
the part of Presiding Officer of Polling Booth No. 37 in
preparing ... means
appears to be an outcome of an inadvertent human error,
and, the possibility of error on the part of Presiding
Officer of Polling Booth
petitioner eligible for financial bid in N.I.T.
considering the error is human and also verify the
balance sheet annexed by petitioner which clearly ... shows error is human/typing error.
(iv) To direct the respondent to
enquire the balance sheet and reply filed by
petitioner and after enquiry
making not only
makes the judges and decision-makers less prone to
errors but also makes them subject to broader
scrutiny. (See David Shapiro ... decision-making, the said requirement is now
virtually a component of human rights and was
considered part of Strasbourg Jurisprudence. See
Ruiz Torija v. Spain
making not only
makes the judges and decision-makers less prone to
errors but also makes them subject to broader
scrutiny. (See David Shapiro ... decision-making, the said requirement is now
virtually a component of human rights and was
considered part of Strasbourg Jurisprudence. See
Ruiz Torija v. Spain
making not only
makes the judges and decision-makers less prone to
errors but also makes them subject to broader
scrutiny. (See David Shapiro ... decision-making, the said requirement is now
virtually a component of human rights and was
considered part of Strasbourg Jurisprudence. See
Ruiz Torija v. Spain
making not only
makes the judges and decision-makers less prone to
errors but also makes them subject to broader
scrutiny. (See David Shapiro ... decision-making, the said requirement is now
virtually a component of human rights and was
considered part of Strasbourg Jurisprudence. See
Ruiz Torija v. Spain
making not only
makes the judges and decision-makers less prone to
errors but also makes them subject to broader
scrutiny. (See David Shapiro ... decision-making, the said requirement is now
virtually a component of human rights and was
considered part of Strasbourg Jurisprudence. See
Ruiz Torija v. Spain
making not only
makes the judges and decision-makers less prone to
errors but also makes them subject to broader
scrutiny. (See David Shapiro ... decision-making, the said requirement is now
virtually a component of human rights and was
considered part of Strasbourg Jurisprudence. See
Ruiz Torija v. Spain
