Vijay Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 26 May, 2017
Vijay Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 26 May, 2017
Author: Ajai Lamba
Bench
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 419 (1.27 seconds)Arumugam vs State Through on 28 March, 2019
sentence should be awarded. A life is at stake
subject to human error and discrepancies and therefore, the doctrine
of "rarest of rare cases
Arumugam vs State Through on 28 March, 2019
sentence should be awarded. A life is at stake
subject to human error and discrepancies and therefore, the doctrine
of "rarest of rare cases
Chandra Prakash Pareek vs State & Anr on 6 July, 2017
officer has recorded a definite
finding that these are bona fide human errors and
consequently in the final outcome no negligence is
attributed ... natural justice. The Court, while
recognizing principles of natural justice as great
humanizing principles, clarified that in making
adverse remarks against an authority
Paras Gangwar (Juvenile) vs State Of Uttarakhand And Another on 6 August, 2022
submitted his explanation,
writing that the report is a result of human error, for
which he tendered apologies. When considered, the court
took strong exceptions
Sunil vs State Of Haryana on 2 April, 2022
Death prior more than 72 hours.
Sorry and human error due to OPD Patients.
2. As the neck of deceased was cut by train
Dalbir Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab on 4 May, 1979
Judicial
error leading to innocent men being executed is not too
recondite a reality. Evidence in Court and assessments by
judges have human limitation. [1071H ... judicial error leading
to innocent men being executed in not too recondite a
reality. Evidence in court and assessments by judges have
human limitations
Rajendra Prasad Etc. Etc vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 9 February, 1979
solution
is obvious since the human stakes are high, and error, even
judicial error
( 1) Jagmohan Singh v State of Uttar Pradesh ... societal
sensibility. Hazy law, where human life hangs in the
balance, injects an agonising consciousness that judicial
error may
(1) Prof. A. R. Blackshield, Associate
Pious vs State Of Kerala on 21 February, 2006
chain the man is not to change him; the error is obvious - a human is more than a simian. Our reasoning upholds Section
Abdul Rajak Murtaja Dafedar vs State Of Maharashtra on 2 May, 1969
thought
processes of human beings and wherever you have thought
processes there is always the risk of error, deception and
even self-deception. For these