justice delivery, appeal provisions are provided to
eliminate the possibility of human error, so have a
sufficient number of opportunities of preferring an
appeal ... have
provided for a review, to eliminate the possibility of human error,
that finality has to be accepted, unless a case for interference is
made
delivery system, appeal provisions are provided to eliminate the
possibility of human error, so has the appeal remedy been made available in
the matter
purpose of providing
a hierarchy of appeal is to obviate a human error and provide
remedy thereagainst. The purpose is for the Appellate Court
secrecy
of ballot, besides lengthy time consuming process and possibility of human
error again, with the introduction of EVMs, recounting only entails
pressing
system of multi tier litigation intended to do away with a human error. The appellate
court may in a given case even though finds
like in the judicial process, though providing for
appeals, to eliminate human error, there has to be a finality attached to the
judicial decision
system of multi tier litigation intended to do away with a human error. The appellate
court may in a given case even though finds
like in the judicial process, though providing for appeals, to
eliminate human error, there has to be a finality attached to the judicial decision
Committees with appeal thereagainst to
the NCTE is only to eliminate human error. It is not as if on account of non
preferring the appeal
been multilayered i.e.
providing for appeals, presumably to eliminate human error in such dispute
resolution by courts manned by human beings. However dispute resolution
