Mr. Trivikraman Thampy vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2025
Author: S.R.Krishna
Play Games 24X7 Private Limited vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2025
Author: S
borne in
mind when considering the cases of
inadvertent human errors creeping into the
filing of GST returns.
14. Applying such principles to the
facts ... observed that an error committed by the
petitioner is an inadvertent human error and
the petitioner should not be prevented from
rectifying the same
that it was an
5
accident that has happened due to human error and therefore,
the petitioners cannot be hauled into these proceedings
particularly ... complaint, at
that point in time, the blast happens due to human error. The
report with regard to the accident also indicates that
borne in mind when considering the cases of
inadvertent human errors creeping into the filing
of GST returns.
14. Applying such principles to the facts ... observed that
an error committed by the petitioner is an
inadvertent human error and the petitioner
borne in mind when considering the cases of inadvertent
human errors creeping into the filing of GST returns.
14. Applying such principles to the facts ... observed that an error committed by the
petitioner is an inadvertent human error and the petitioner
should not be prevented from rectifying the same
Commission could have corrected the
error at that time. This human error is glorified by the
Commission by declining to accede to the request ... error and that error had been set
- 18 -
WP No. 24847 of 2022
at naught by the constitutional Courts; the error in the case
Vehicles and therefore, the accident has occurred
not on account of human error but beyond the control of a
human being ... that the accident has occurred not on account of the
human error or by the rash and negligent driving of the
accused
learned counsel for the petitioner that it was a
human error and a bona fide mistake and there was no
intention to divert the goods ... establish that the diversion was
deliberate and was not a human error. He submits that the
driver being from Tumkur could not have committed
principle of law i.e. the finality of decisions. It is human to error and Judges are human. Their errors may be errors of facts