Satish which appears on the second page
seems to be merely an error which does not demerit the complaint or the
depositions of the complainant ... easily ignored. It may have appeared for numerous
reasons for example human error or slipping of name etc. which need not
be discussed herein
ledger account Ex.CW1/1, which was only an
human error and ought to have given an opportunity to the
revisionist/petitioner to explain
Trial Court has failed
to appreciate that there can be human error on the part of the
Stenographer of the said court
wherein it has been observed that normal discrepancies or errors do creep in
because every human being has human failings and limitations ... wherein it has been
observed that normal discrepancies or errors do creep in because every human
being has human failings and limitations
wherein
it has been observed that normal discrepancies or errors do creep in because every
human being has human failings and limitations
human memories apt to blur with passage of time.
Further, a person is not expected to depose with mathematical precision
and error due to lapse
public way in a
rash and negligent manner so as to endanger human
life or likely to cause hurt or injury to any person ... public way in a rash and
negligent manner to endanger human life or likely to
cause hurt or injury to any other person
errors do creep in
FIR No. 265/1999 PS Mehrauli
State vs. Ishwar Singh & Anr. Page 8 of 13
because every human being
separate places and can match two
(2) samples with a reported theoretical error rate of less than one (1) in a
trillion.
Just like ... have come from the suspect.
As earlier stated, certain regions of human DNA show
variations between people. In each of these regions, a person possesses
making not only makes the judges and decision-makers less prone to errors but also makes them subject to broader scrutiny. (See David Shapiro ... decision-making, the said requirement is now virtually a component of human rights and was considered part of Strasbourg Jurisprudence. See Ruiz Torija v. Spain
